Protest against remote learning order

Jennifer Singer and about 50 other parents held a rally outside the home of Montco Commissioners’ Chair Val Arkoosh to protest the remote-learning order. Many have been sending their children to school five days a week. “You can’t learn to read through a computer,” she said. “You can’t learn to write through a computer. It’s just devastating to them.” Singer, who lives in Montgomery Township, said her children’s school has had zero reported cases of the virus. — Ximena Conde/WHYY

Montgomery County students will have at least two weeks of all-virtual school after a judge denied a legal challenge to the county’s remote-learning order.

The Montco Board of Health voted last week to suspend in-person instruction at all K-12 schools in the county starting Monday, Nov. 23. The order is intended to help slow the spread of the coronavirus.

Last Wednesday, three county residents sued over the remote-learning mandate, arguing the board violated Pennsylvania’s open meetings law by failing to provide sufficient notice of the vote, by limiting public comment, and by holding a private meeting the night prior to the public vote.

But Montgomery County Common Pleas Court Judge Richard P. Haaz wasn’t convinced, noting that lawmakers in Harrisburg passed an April amendment to that law — known as the “Sunshine Act” — loosening the notice and comment requirements during the pandemic.

“Petitioners failed to satisfy their burden of proof that Respondents violated the Sunshine Act,” Haaz wrote in his six-page opinion.

Haaz also noted that all five Board of Health members testified that the private meeting held on the eve of the vote was to share information, not for the purposes of making a decision.

The plaintiffs took the news in stride. “I do not view this as a total loss,” said plaintiff John Niehls in a Facebook video posted immediately after the ruling. “Because what we did accomplish is we did send a message to the county that we are not going to stand by and just accept them shutting down our schools.”

Niehls added that his legal team is already preparing to file another lawsuit, arguing that the Board of Health did not have the authority to issue an order requiring schools to move online.

Niehl’s legal team has been paid for by a crowdfunding campaign that has raised over $10,000 in the last week.

Montgomery County’s order follows a similar decision in Philadelphia to bar in-person learning at the city’s high schools and colleges through at least the end of the year. The School District of Philadelphia also recently decided to delay a post-Thanksgiving return to the classroom for some younger children.

The Pennsylvania Department of Education has suggested that schools in counties where there are “substantial” amounts of COVID-19 transmission should conduct all classes online.

Currently, according to guidelines set by the Pennsylvania Department of Health, Philadelphia and its four collar counties are seeing “substantial” transmission.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.