George Zimmerman

George Zimmerman, shown testifying in 2016, has filed a lawsuit against the parents of Trayvon Martin and their attorney over his prosecution in the 2012 killing of Martin.

— Red Huber/Orlando Sentinel via AP, Pool, File

George Zimmerman has filed a $100 million lawsuit in Florida state court. The 36-page lawsuit, which reads like a conspiracy novel, alleges that Zimmerman is “the victim” of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, civil conspiracy and defamation.

He names the parents of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin and the Martin’s family attorney Ben Crump along with a number of other defendants. In a nutshell, Zimmerman’s lawsuit claims that there was no legitimate basis for his prosecution. Instead, he asserts that prosecutors conspired against him to fabricate witness testimony and that a new book by Crump contained false claims about him.

Crump, along with Trayvon’s parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, denied the allegations.

“This plaintiff continues to display a callous disregard for everyone by himself, revictimizing individuals whose lives were shattered by his own misguided actions,” Crump said in a statement issued on his and Travon’s parents’ behalf.

How astonishing that Zimmerman, who shot and killed Trayvon on Feb. 26, 2012, can now claim to be the victim. Martin’s young life was taken by Zimmerman who incorrectly assumed that Martin was some sort of harmful vagrant. The truth, however, was that Martin was simply an innocent teen with a pack of Skittles in his pocket, who was having a visit with his dad. He represented no danger to the community at all.

Trayvon Martin’s death was so tragic, so unnecessary, and so preventable. Zimmerman’s lawsuit opens up these wounds all over again. It appears to matter little to Zimmerman that he killed a youngster and that Martin’s parents are eternally suffering after the death of their son. Instead, Zimmerman is spinning a narrative about how the system conspired to “frame” him for murder.

How disgusting, distasteful and unfortunate that even nearly eight years later a young Black life could mean so little to the person who took it away. Zimmerman’s appalling litigation raises the specter of racial injustice in America: how much — and how little — has changed.

In 2012, President Barack Obama said if he had a son, “he’d look like Trayvon.” One could hardly imagine such a gesture of presidential empathy today. And yes, the sad reality is that Trayvon Martin could have been anyone’s son. Zimmerman just saw him as a Black male up to no good. And this stereotype persists today.

Trayvon Martin’s only offense was being young, Black and male, while wearing a hoodie. Think of the countless other Black males fitting a similar description. Since Trayvon Martin’s shooting death, there have been so many other questionable killings of unarmed Black men all across the country. Freddie Gray in Baltimore. Laquan McDonald in Chicago. Eric Garner in Staten Island. Walter Scott in South Carolina. Philando Castile in Minnesota. And Botham Jean, who was shot in his own apartment in Texas. This unfortunate list seems endless.

It is devastating to consider both that Zimmerman’s lawsuit could indicate his belief that he deserves sympathy, and that whatever progress America has made since Martin’s killing may be unraveling. But we must discuss, we must consider. In doing so, we must address and resolve the bias involving the fear of black males. These killings represent the harshest reality, but there are daily interactions involving Black men that even when not fatal, are demeaning and unnecessary.

Take for example the Black men in Starbucks who were arrested while waiting to have a business meeting in 2017. Or the man who was accused of breaking and entering in New York, who was just moving into his own apartment. And let’s not forget the man who got kicked out of his hotel in Oregon simply for speaking on the phone in the lobby. This list, too, is seemingly endless.

Against the backdrop of all that has occurred in this context since Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin, I’m not surprised he’d file such a lawsuit. It’s as if he’s saying: “How dare prosecutors seek to hold me accountable for taking this young man’s life — does it really matter?”

Given the current state of affairs, it makes you wonder how many others harbor such a callous attitude. Judging by the multiple, high-profile incidents of violence toward innocent black citizens since Trayvon Martin’s death, the answer appears to be: far too many.

Joey Jackson is a legal analyst for CNN and HLN, and a partner at New York City-based Watford Jackson, PLLC.

(2) comments

pcuzz

Its obvious that Mr Jackson did not review Zimmerman evidence prior to writing this article. I dont know if his claims are true but the evidence is compelling,although when you read the article its obvious that Mr Jackson did not follow the trial and the overwhelming evidence that proved George Zimmerman was in fact an innocent man and continues to be defamed.

21tomlinson

It's good to see that CNN is deleting comments that expose the reality that ZImmerman was exonerated at trial because he acted in self defense when he killed Trayvon, who had broken Zimmernan's nose and was punching him repeatedly in the face for 45 seconds as Zimmerman screamed for help. Typical ultra leftist CNN, ignoring facts and evidence that don't support their racist narrative.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.